January 1973 marked a watershed moment in American society when the Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade that the Constitution protects the right to abortion. This decision didn't emerge in a cultural vacuum—it reflected a deeper shift in how our society views the sanctity of human life, the authority of moral tradition, and the role of faith in public discourse.
Looking back over fifty years later, under the leadership of Pope Leo XIV, we can see how this pivotal moment revealed fundamental questions that continue to challenge Christians today: How do we respond when cultural institutions abandon biblical principles? What does it mean to defend the defenseless in an age that prioritizes personal autonomy above all else?
The Court's Troubling Reasoning
What made the 1973 decision particularly concerning wasn't just its conclusion, but the reasoning behind it. The Court explicitly chose to side with ancient pagan practices over the consistent teachings of both Judaism and Christianity throughout history. This wasn't merely a legal decision—it was a worldview choice that prioritized ancient pagan acceptance of abortion over centuries of Christian moral wisdom.
The Court noted that "ancient religion" did not prohibit abortion, but by this they clearly meant paganism, since both Judaism and Christianity had consistently opposed the taking of innocent life. This represented a fundamental shift: American jurisprudence was no longer grounding itself in the moral traditions that had shaped Western civilization, but was actively choosing to reject them.
"The decision runs counter not merely to the moral teachings of Christianity through the ages but also to the moral sense of the American people, as expressed in the now vacated abortion laws of almost all states."
Against the Moral Sense of the People
What made this decision even more troubling was how it contradicted not only Christian teaching but also democratic sentiment. The Court overruled laws that had been democratically enacted in state after state, including recent affirmations through state-wide referendums. This revealed a concerning pattern: when cultural elites disagreed with both Christian tradition and popular will, they were willing to use judicial power to impose their vision on society.
This judicial activism represented something unprecedented in American history—a complete repudiation of the moral framework that had guided the nation's founding. The same court that had banned prayer and Bible reading in schools was now rejecting biblical standards on the most fundamental question of when life begins and deserves protection.
A Callous Utilitarianism
The decision revealed what many Christians recognized as a "callous utilitarianism"—a worldview that judges human worth based on utility rather than inherent dignity. Under this philosophy, the inconvenient, the unwanted, and the defenseless become expendable. The unborn child, unable to speak for themselves, could be eliminated for the convenience of others.
This utilitarian calculus stands in stark contrast to the Christian understanding of human dignity, which is grounded not in our usefulness but in our creation in the image of God. Every human life, from conception to natural death, possesses infinite worth because it bears the divine stamp of its Creator.
The Prophetic Voice of Christianity Today
The Christian response to Roe v. Wade demonstrated something beautiful about the Church: when the culture abandons moral truth, faithful Christians don't remain silent. They speak prophetically, even when their voices are unpopular. The immediate recognition that this decision was morally wrong showed that the Church still possessed what our secular culture was losing—a moral compass grounded in eternal truth rather than shifting cultural winds.
This prophetic stance required courage. It meant standing against not just popular opinion but also powerful cultural institutions. It meant being willing to be labeled as backward, narrow-minded, or extreme. Yet Christians understood that faithfulness to God sometimes requires standing alone against the crowd.
Lessons for Today's Church
The events of 1973 offer important lessons for Christians navigating today's moral challenges. First, we see that cultural transformation often happens gradually, then suddenly. The legal revolution of 1973 was preceded by decades of shifting attitudes about human sexuality, marriage, and the role of religion in public life.
Second, we learn that Christians must be prepared to maintain their moral convictions even when cultural institutions abandon them. The Court's decision showed that we cannot rely on secular institutions to preserve Christian values—that responsibility falls to the Church itself.
Third, we see the importance of engaging in the democratic process while it remains available to us. The fact that abortion laws had been democratically affirmed in multiple states showed that public opinion was not yet fully captured by the new moral relativism. Christian voices and votes still mattered.
Hope in Dark Times
While 1973 marked a dark chapter in American moral history, it also revealed the resilience of Christian conviction. The immediate and clear response from faithful Christians showed that God's moral law had not been erased from human hearts, even when it was rejected by human courts.
This gives us hope for today. No matter how far our culture drifts from biblical truth, God's moral law remains written on human hearts. The natural law that tells us to protect the innocent, care for the vulnerable, and defend the defenseless cannot be legislated away by human courts.
Our Continuing Calling
The challenge facing Christians today is similar to that faced by believers in 1973: How do we remain faithful to biblical truth in a culture that has largely abandoned it? How do we speak with both grace and truth about difficult moral issues?
We must remember that our ultimate hope is not in political victories or cultural acceptance, but in the God who rules over all human institutions. Courts may issue wrong decisions, cultures may embrace destructive philosophies, but God's truth endures forever.
Our calling remains the same: to speak prophetically for the voiceless, to defend the defenseless, and to bear witness to the God who created every human life in His image. We do this not because we expect earthly victory, but because we serve the God of justice who will ultimately right every wrong.
May we have the same moral courage shown by Christians in 1973—the courage to stand for truth when the culture abandons it, to defend the innocent when they cannot defend themselves, and to trust in God's ultimate justice when human justice fails.
Kommentare